Effective and Non-Effective Product Placement

by Amy Rasplicka, 6/15/2011 2:47:34 PM | with 0 comments
I recently saw the action movie “Thor,” a sci-fi thriller about the mythical Norse God of Thunder. I entered the theater rather reluctantly (the group of friends I was with had firmly denied my pleas to go see “Water for Elephants”), but “Thor” was actually better than I had expected. However, I was annoyed by the movie’s blatant overuse of product placement. For example, in one scene, Natalie Portman’s character fumbled with a box of Kashi cereal for literally five minutes.

According to Front Row Marketing, 18 other brands were shown and/or mentioned in “Thor,” including Acura, Dell and Southwest Airlines. Product placement is supposed to do what mere commercials cannot – persuade customers to use a product by subtly placing it in an everyday context (as “everyday” as speaking to a Norse god can be). However, the product placement in “Thor” seemed overly excessive. For me, the plethora of brand-name products and the unnecessary number of times each brand was shown actually decreased the effectiveness of this method of advertising.

On the other hand, the award-winning TV series “Mad Men,” which depicts a 1960’s Madison Avenue advertising agency, uses product placement very effectively. No anachronism here – the show stays true to the era, only incorporating brands (such as American Airlines, Gillette, and Smirnoff) that already existed in the 1960’s. However, what truly makes this show’s product placement so effective is that we have no idea which companies have paid to have their products included, and which have not. An entire episode might be devoted to a single product, leaving us wondering – did money change hands, or did this product simply serve the script best?

We will probably never know, and that is part of the allure of “Mad Men.” Advertising is largely about playing off of emotions, and the aura of mystery surrounding the show’s seamlessly integrated products leaves me feeling curious, rather than annoyed. I would much rather spend 45 minutes hearing about Heineken beer in the context of the plot, than have a box of Kashi waved at me for five minutes in an awkward, contrived scene. After all, the whole point of product placement is to incorporate products into shows or movies so well that the audience doesn’t feel like they’re watching a commercial.

As DVRs become more commonplace, and as online content overtakes printed newspapers and magazines, traditional advertising – like commercials and print ads – is becoming less effective. This means we’ll likely see even more product placement in the coming months. What shows or movies have you seen lately that effectively used product placement? Which ones failed? Share below!

Category: Placement, Product

Share using:Add to DeliciousAdd to DiggAdd to RedditAdd to Yahoo MyWebAdd to Yahoo BookmarksAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to TerchnoratiAdd to Google BookmarksAdd to MySpace
Trackback URL: http://www.piercom.com/trackback/be882e15-e71f-49fe-bf18-53d76949d66a/Effective-and-Non-Effective-Product-Placement.aspx

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.
Leave comment
Name:

E-mail:

Your URL:
Comments:

Enter security code:
 Security code




Tag Cloud


Recent posts

Tips on Writing an Email Pitch
Digital Influence Weekly - Building Better Conversations Online
STOP SELLING!
Buried in Emails? Three Ways to Avoid Inbox Overload
Is Requiring Social Media Password Bad for Business?

Post archive

May 2012(5)
April 2012(8)
March 2012(7)
February 2012(7)
January 2012(5)
December 2011(11)
November 2011(8)
October 2011(7)
September 2011(9)
August 2011(11)
July 2011(10)
June 2011(11)
May 2011(16)
April 2011(13)
March 2011(11)
February 2011(7)
January 2011(6)
December 2010(7)
November 2010(10)
October 2010(9)
September 2010(6)
August 2010(4)
July 2010(7)
June 2010(2)
May 2010(3)
April 2010(4)
March 2010(5)
February 2010(8)
January 2010(3)
December 2009(6)
November 2009(2)
October 2009(2)
September 2009(1)

Syndication